March 3, 2012

Criminal Lawyer Kills Businessman but The Judge Goes to Jail


From book,"Tomato Soup for Judges and Lawyers" imaginin

 21st Century criminal laws

 They five sat together at Goa beach
One was plaintiff’s lawyer
One was a defendant’s lawyer
One was a criminal lawyer
One was a Judge
And one was a businessman
Together they talked tipsy

“Don’t you think
We must have some say
in appointment of Judges”,
Criminal Lawyer emptied his glass

“That won’t be necessary at all”
The businessman broke the bad news,
‘Government is planning now
to disinvest entire judicial industry
And bids too have come

"Multinational brands have offered
One Court in every Mall
Justice in 30 days or refund of court fee paid

 Foreign Direct Investment has offers 10,000,000 crores
On only one condition
 its Chairman should be apoindet lifetime Chief Justice of India"
Businessman said in a husky voice

Shocked Judge spoke first,
“How can they deliver
Justice in 30 days?

Businessman explained,
“World over people are trying
To replace judges with computers;
Evaluation of evidence
To be replaced with
Calculation of evidence
  
One blow means three years R.I.
Two blows mean six years R.I.
Feed key facts and data in computers,
 and press a button
Out comes trial court judgement!

Press another button
And out comes Appellate Judgement!

Press last button
And out comes Supreme Court order saying,
‘We regret to dismiss your SLP
Come again after six months
If circumstances change
We appreciated relations with you"

Businessman saw the future of Law in India

“Oh! No, My friend, No.
You just don’t understand
What exactly is Criminal Law”
 Criminal Lawyer brightened up,
“Let me give you a Demo” he said

He took out a revolver from his pocket
And shot down businessman
With three bullets, there and then
Just in order to give a demo

He turned to stunned audience,
Put revolver in his pocket
And explained,
what exactly is criminal law!

“The whole object of criminal law is
 not to let criminals know
What exactly is criminal law!

"If they know what is criminal law,
Will they not start committing
Crimes in accordance with law?

"To keep them groping in dark,
Criminal law must keep changing
From facts to facts
From case to case
From courts to courts
From bench to bench
From counsel to counsel
And from hour to hour”

Criminal lawyer aptly explained
Why computerization can’t work
At least in criminal law!”

And Then he called the police
To take away the dead body
of businessman forthwith

P.S. I. Came
And arrested all of the four

“I did nothing, I was just sitting”
The Judge protested

“I.P.C. 302 r/w 34 is the charge,
 Common intention can develop
on spur of moment;
No overt act is necessary;
You judges have said this!”
P.S.I replied,

“Let us move
a common bail application for all”
Criminal lawyer showed the way

Sessions Judge granted bail
To all three lawyers:
But refused bail to Judge
As police had said,
Revolver was found from Judge’s pocket
And Investigation was on

Desperate judge moved High Court
High Court rejected bail
And ordered departmental inquiry
Against the judge
  
Double desperate judge
Moved Supreme Court;
The Court of last resort
Where all things are considered
To balance scales of justice

As matter came up for admission,
Senior Judge threw the opening ball,

“Tell us first, Mr. Counsel,
What business your client had
To sit with lawyers at Goa beach?
Didn’t he knew the cliché
A snake lives hidden
Under sleeves of every lawyer?”


“My lords!! My client was just sitting!
It was criminal lawyer who did it,
Investigation is perverse wholesale!”
The counsel asserted

“Yeh, yah! we have read that.
But you have to prove this in trial”
Brother judge said sympathetically

“Tell us, who called the police?”
Brother judge asked a pertinent question

“My Lords! Criminal lawyer called police”
Counsel replied correctly

“Then? Why would he call police
if he had killed businessman?
In fact he should have been made Complainant
If he will come to us,
We may discharge him”,
Brother Judge said putting down the file
And picking up the next matter

Senior judge too put down the case
but said empathetically,
“Not a case for interference under Art.136”

Counsel came out from court
And conveyed the result on cell phone
 “SLP is dismissed
but there is nothing to worry;
the Judges have said,
After you have completed five years,
We can move another bail application”
Counsel put emphasis on word We
For reasons best known to him


 Haresh A. Raichura

(from my book "Tomato Soup for Judges and Lawyers"