I saw one example today.
Every year, Institution and State authorities change some rules at last minute.. Even if these rules are violative of SC norms.
Successful students first challenge these rules at High Court level.
By the time case reach to Supreme Court, it gets very late, some counselling are over and some courses are about to start.
So Supreme Court do not like to disturb process. So many counselling choices will need to be undone.. So they refiuse to interfere, Illegality then continues .. Even if the actions are violative, rules are wrong..
Simply because counselling have started, students lose cases. Time is to short. and is made difficult for Supreme Court to undo counselling.
And this is happening year after year !
Haresh Raichura
6/9/13
Haresh Raichura
6/9/13