An experience of "Instant Nirvana", Liberation.... Amazing... 2 min read ->

Last night I had a stressful dream.

My wife was admitted in a very big hospital. I was also there.

The hospital was very big. It had highly sophisticated procedures.

So many doctors.. So many nurses, so many staff.. and so many equipments.

Different doctors used to visit daily for making diagnosis.

All tests were made at two places and were compared to check accuracy and to avoid errors.

Almost all things were documented and the doctors used to discussed their findings with each other with serious faces.

For five days, traumatic treatments continued.

Finally my wife and I decided that though she had weakness, we were well enough to leave the hospital and to go home.

We started packing up and intimated the staff about our intention to leave and asked them to prepare bills.

We overheard some to doctors discussing between them about how unwise and bad our decision to leave hospital was.

Then we were told that we will have to meet a senior physician before we can leave.

So we went to office of the Senior physician. Here there was a long queue of patients. We waited in queue for our turn. 

Waiting was taking undue long time.

Finally, I became frustrated and fed up with waiting and realised that this was all just a dream.

I moved my hands and walls of hospital disappeared, the doctors and everything else disappeared, I just woke up in my bed.

Without paying any bills of the hospital, I just walked to the mirror of my bathroom and started brushing my teeth.

Then I made my tea, and sat down to sip tea and to write down this blog.

It was an "Instant Nirvana" or Liberation for me. It came instantly when I realised that this was all a dream.

Unusual thing about this dream was : During the dream itself I realised that it was a dream. ( Not after waking up ! ) 

Haresh Raichura
31/1/2015


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Wow!!! ....SC : Pay 10L compensation to heirs of person who died of shock from illegally take line from electricity pole !

Today.

Date 30/1/15

Hon'ble Judges: Hon'ble Chief Justice H. L. Duttu & Justice A. K. Sikri.

Facts as overheard:


Man was using illegal electricity line by fixing wiring on Electricity Pole.

He died while taking shower in bathroom due to electricity shock.

High Court ordered payment of Rs. 10 Lakh to be paid to heirs of deceased.

Supreme Court declined to interfere with High Court order.

Principle :

Vicarious Liabilities of Electric companies for death due to electric shocks from electricity lines illegally taken from electricity poles.

Result:

High Court judgement became final as of now for this and other similar cases.

Wow !!!!

Haresh Raichura
30/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Supreme Court's latest judgement on "Double Jeopardy" which also discusses U.S. laws in area

The case citation is Union of India Versus Purushottam reported in 2015(1)SCALE 1 Decision date 5/1/15

Hon'ble Justices who discussed law are : Justice Vikramajit Sen and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh

Main topic:

A man is acquitted in criminal case after trial.

Can on same facts, on same issue of his culpability can he be reexamined second time for purpose of deciding his suitability in government job or not?

International case discussed : John Hudson vs United States 522 US 93 (1997)

Haresh Raichura
30/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Judicial Reform Areas: Simplicity by which the leading SeniorAdvocate, and Jurist Andhyarujina was Designate as Senior Advocate.... It was a very simple process... #lawyers #india

Simplicity by which the leading Senior Advocate & Jurist Andhyarujina was Designate as Senior Advocate.

He is today a leading name in the field of Constitutional Law.

Once he was sitting by a Senior Advocate in a case.

That Senior Advocate saw some potential unfolded talents in T. R. Andhyarujina.

He asked him, "Why don't you become a Senior Advocate?"

He mumbled something in reply.

That Senior Advocate, then and there wrote a letter to then Chief Justice recommending that this Junior Advocate was fit to be senior advocate.

Next week he was designated.

It was that simple.

Since Chief Justices in those days used respect recommendations of Senior Advocates, the Senior Advocates had in turn powers influence conduct and behaviours of junior advocates in those days.. Junior advocates used to respect and learn from senior advocates.

NOW (This an old 2015 post. Now reforms are there) 

Now over the periods, the procedures have changed. Many things are taking place before Chief Justice designates an advocate as Senior Advocate. The Senior Advocates of Bar have practically no say in the process and therefore they have no control over junior Advocates. The power to recommend has been now taken over by elected representatives of Bar who may have only vote bank and other interests of their own.

Many things, right and wrong are heard.

As result, bar disintegrates and internal respect of "Advocates towards Senior Advocates and Judges" is being reduced day by day.

The issue is so sad that nothing more is worth saying about the issue.

Haresh Raichura
Advocate
29/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

SC: None has right to publish anything about anyone without his consent, whether TRUTHFUL or otherwise - Right to privacy

Supreme Court has clarified law of Right to Privacy and damages since 1995

It said :

1) A citizen has right to safeguard the privacy of his own, his family, marriage, procreation, motherhood, child bearing & education, among other matters.

2) No one has right to publish anything about anyone concerning above without his consent. Whether it be truthful or otherwise,
Whether it be laudatory or critical.

3) If anyone will do so, he will be liable in action ( suit) for damages.

4) The above rule is not applicable when what is stated is from public records available for public knowledge.

Case Reference : R Rajagopal v/s State of TN 1995 (6)SCC 632

Haresh Raichura
24/12/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Shift of Power : From Bar Councils to Courts :- Power to debar an advocate from practicing in Courts :- How & Why

There is one famous rule of power.
It says, "Power slips away from hands which are not capable of holding it."

The power to debar and to prohibit a lawyer from practising in courts is essentially a power of Bar Council of India and of other Bar Councils of various States.  

For some reasons, they failed to use this power on many occasions.

One reason is "these are elected bodies". Here, office bearers are elected by lawyers.

It happened or it looked like that some lawyers who were appearing to be committing misconduct, had also a big "Vote Bank of Lawyers" with them, or it appeared that they were politically very influential.

For one reason or another, Bar Councils appeared to have some difficulty in debarring and removing influential and erring lawyers.

So the Courts found a Way

First happened it in a case known as V C Misra case. He was chairman of Bar Council of India. Some serious allegations were made.

Justice Kuldeep Singh gave a judgement which said that Courts have power to debar a lawyer from practising for certain period under Contempt cases. And he debarred Chairman of Bar Council from practising in any court for few months.

Then this case is followed in many cases and now it appears, that the Courts have started using this power.

The Great Disadvantage

The main apprehension is this :-

if you give power to judges to debar any lawyer, will it not prevent lawyers to argue boldly before judges? Will it not prevent a lawyer from exposing or protesting against a judge who may be corrupt?

Only time can answer this questions.

Haresh Raichura
15/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Do you know that you can intervene in any public interest case pending in Supreme Court by way of Intervention Application? ->

In Supreme Court many cases involves points of law which affect large number of cases which may be pending in various courts in India.

There are many cases where issues determined can have affect on large population.

If someone wants to intervene in Supreme Court in some case / or if someone is likely to be affected by decision of Supreme Court, then he can apply to be heard during hearing of this case.

This is normally done by filing an INTERVENTION APPLICATION.

Here, applicant seeks permission of court to permit him to intervene in case.

The application has to be filed through a registered Advocate-On-Record in Supreme Court. A list of Advocate-On-Record can be found at website of Supreme Court.

Supreme Court may or may not grant this application. Applicant must show how he is affected or interested in the subject matter.

But if Supreme Court allows such application, then applicant can address court through his advocate and can present his view point on subject matter of case.

Haresh Raichura
13/1/14


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

CONCENTRATION : A Lawyer, reading his case, never noticed a marriage procession passing in front of his doors with bands & music->

UIt is very easy to read in a silent, isolated place.

But when you can read with 100% concentration while sitting at a crowded place, you have true concentration.

I can cite THREE examples from my personal knowledge:-

1) There was a lawyer who lived in a rented one room flat. His wife and children used to watch TV.

At that very same time, in one corner of that room, the lawyer used to read his cases. His concentration was such that he could read even when TV was going on.

He wrote also books and later he became Judge of High Court, then Chief Justice, then acting Governor of a State, then a Supreme Court Judge and he is now retired.

2) Another case is of a lawyer who is presently practising in Supreme Court. His office is open.

Once there was a marriage in house of his next door neighbour. He decided to go when Procession from Groom Side comes.

Then he started reading his case.

When his reading was over, he inquired and found that groom side procession had already came, it passed by his office, with all band and noise and the marriage was also over in neighbour's house.

He never noticed or heard these noises, when he was absorbed in reading his case.

This is a true case as told by advocate G.S.Bhatt

3) I knew about one another advocate in a small town of Veraval in Gujarat. His office was also like a shop with doors on road. No glass partitions.

His office was next to a cinema hall. Several times in a day, noisy audience of cinema used to pass by his office.

He used to continue to read his cases without being disturbed by noises on road.

As a child, I used to pass by his office and used to see him absorbed in reading his cases.

This was about 45 years ago.

The Point is : It is possible to concentrate notwithstanding one's circumstances.

Haresh Raichura
13/1/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Know why no Judge can judge any case unless he has got powers to punish for contempt- Some reasons

What is contempt?

In simple words, anything which prevents a judge from deciding a case, fearlessly and without disturbances, is Contempt of Court.

If you sit for a day in any court you will know reasons.

He has to interact with all sorts of devils and bullies.

In his court, there are rapists, murderers, quarrelling spouses, bullying lawyers, mad-with-too-much-money tycoons, sons of power-mad politicians, gangsters, obsessed neurotics and what not.

To make them sit and to ask them to speak one by one as per procedures prescribed in law itself is a challenging task.

And the judges do not have their Army.

They depend on State Government to enforce their orders.

The task is really tough when a Judge has to pass and enforce orders against the State Government's officers themselves !

Therefore, they have got powers to punish for contempt anyone who disobeys them or disturbs his mind or disrupts process of justice.

These powers are not dependant on Contempt of Court Act.. The powers are inherent in all judges from time immemorial...

No judge can judge without power to punish for its contempt.

Contempt of Court Act only prescribes some procedures to ensure that some erring judges do not abuse these powers wrongly or for personal motives.

Haresh Raichura
13/1/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Even in cases where "Dead Body" or "Cause of Death" is not found, an accused can be CONVICTED for MURDER u/s 302 ->

There have been many reported criminal cases where after murdering a victim, the criminal destroys the dead body of victim.

Dead Body is never found. The cause of death is never found. 

And yet the Accused have been convicted on charge of murder under Sec.302 of IPC. 

The prosecution has to however prove a "Homicidal Death" and has to prove a chain of circumstances. 

These convictions are called cases of "Circumstantial Evidence".

Haresh Raichura
10/1/2015




Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Doubtful SC view-Children of Live in Relation -Not entitled to share in Ancestral Property -Can claim share in Self Acquired property

Above view is based on Supreme Court Judgement in case of Bharatha Matha versus R. Vijaya reported in 2010(6) SCALE 53

In my view, above view is not correctly decided as the effect on society of new Live in Relationship trends in not examined and argued.

The judgement is based on perspective of rights of "Illegitimate Children".

But when Live in Relationships are not violative of law, their Children cannot be termed as "Illegitimate"

This view may be right when one spouse is already married to someone else and living illegitimately with some one else, but this view may not be correct for other truly live in marriages.

The proposition of law need to be rechecked in some relevant cases.

Haresh Raichura
6/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Nudity is allowed when used to express Art, but obscenity is still punishable

Law draws a fine distinction between "Nudity" and "Obscenity"

Both words are extensively debated in reported law decisions and opinions.

Publication of Nudity may not be punishable as such where it is expressed as an artistic expression.

Whereas publication of obscenity is something which abhorrent to society and which is repugnant to mind.

Publication containing Obscenity is still punishable under Indian Penal Code.

Haresh Raichura
6/1/15



Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014 All Rights Reserved

When "FIR of any murder is registered against some unknown persons" NINE steps which follow :-

1) Police keeps a Register, where each FIR is registered by Serial number.

2) A copy of FIR is required to be sent to Magistrate within 24 hours.

3) Police Station Head assigns FIR to some Police Investigator to investigate crime.

4) Police Investigator has to keep a diary in which he has to keep note of every steps he takes and dates and time required to be recorded.

If someone makes allegation against Police, the Court can ask to see his diary to check what he is doing.

5) Police Investigation Officer will record statements of people who may be knowing something about crime.

These are called Statements under Sec.161

6) If in course of investigation, if he believes that someone has committed crime, he can arrest him and then produce him before judge 

7) At this time,  he can ask for remand of arrested person for custodial interrogation.

8) At end of investigation, he has to give a report to Court.

9) Once FIR is registered, Police Investigating Officer cannot close this investigation without permission of court.

Haresh Raichura
6/1/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

What is "Full Court Reference" in Supreme Court or in High Court? #Judiciary #India

When some very prominent judge or lawyer has passed away, within few days a "Full Court Reference" is held in memory of departed soul.

Usually, in the Court Room of Chief Justice, all other judges come.

Prominent lawyers, Attorney General, Advocate General, President of Bar Association gather.

Those who experience of working with departed soul, share their memories and contributions of departed soul.

Then a 2 min silence is observed to pay respect to the departed soul.

This is known as "Full Court Reference".

Haresh Raichura
5/1/2014

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Two Lama discuss "How Dharma is part of Basic Structure and What is the Basic Structure in Constitution of India"

Two Lama discuss "How Dharma is part of Basic Structure and What is the Basic Structure in Constitution of India"

In the mountains of Himalaya

Younger Lama asks Elder Lama,
"Yesterday you said,
'Judges in India should bring
Dharma in Judiciary as
Doing justice according to law
Is not enough'

"So I checked Constitution of India
And found that Dharma is not
Mentioned in their Constitution.

Then how can they do justice
In accordance with Dharma?"

Elder Lama replied,

"Dharma is part of Basic Structure of Constitution of India"

Younger Lama asked again,

"What is Basic Structure of
Constitution of India?"

Elder Lama explained
By giving one example,

"Your Time on Earth
And your Life on Earth
Are two inseparable things.

At end of everyday,
Your Time on Earth
And your Life on Earth
Are reduced by 24 hours!

Here, speed and direction of
Time of Your Life, is constant
And unchangeable.

This is Basic Structure of your life.

On the other hand,
Your Life on Earth
Is changeable.
You can amend it,
You can change how you live.

Same is the way about
Constitution of India

It's those parts which are constant
And which cannot be amended,

Even by Parliament,
Are Called "Basic Structure".

Younger Lama asked further,

"On what basis you say that
Dharma is part of Basic Structure
Of Constitution of India?"

Elder Lama replied,
"Dharma flows from
Art 21,14 & 142
Of Constitution of India.
Dharma is wider than Justice.

Indian Constitution is an evolving Constitution.

Judges discover and define
And redefine its Basic Structure
As and when necessity arises"

••••

It was difficult for Younger Lama
To fully understand this concept

So he decided to sit in
Meditation to understand

More about Basic Structure
Of his life,
Of his body,
Of his Time on Earth,
And almost about
Everything around him

He started seeing two parts

In everything around him,

The Unchangable Part

And 

The Changeable Part

He could his consciousness 

Elevated to a higher level.

- Haresh Raichura
4/1/2015


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Do you know that Constitution of India itself allows govt to pass gender biased law specially in favour of woman ->

Many pro-man activists complain against woman-friendly laws on the ground that it violates Equality between man and woman.

They say that the Constitution guarantees that no one shall be discriminated on ground of gender, sex,... On basis of man or woman etc.

And thus they oppose such laws as gender biased laws.

What they are missing ?

There are sub provisions below Equality Articles in Constitution.

This sub - Provisions say that Nothing contained in Equality clauses shall prevent any government from making any law, specially in favour of woman and other weaker sections of society.

Thus, the Constitution permits government to make special laws favourable to woman.

If anyone wants to challenge such law, he cannot do it on ground that it creates inequality between man and woman.

He should challenge such laws, probably on following grounds:-

Some suggested grounds:-

1) The classification made is arbitrary.

Unequal cannot be treated as equal.

A double graduated woman cannot be treated as "Weaker Section woman" at par with an illiterate maid woman.

If law give same Benefits to both types of women, it violates Art.14

2) The law is too vague. It gives wide powers to judges without indicating objects for which such powers are to be used.

3) The law casts too much burden on man to prove that which is unprovable.

Presumptions prescribed in law are too excessive and therefore violative of Art.14

4) Etc etc.

The Point is you cannot challenge a law in favour of woman, only on ground that it treats Man & Woman differently and is gender biased.

Haresh Raichura
4/1/2015

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Know when "Bailable Warrant" & "Non Bailable Warrant" are issued- And Know how both are actually "Bailable"->

1) Bailable warrant is bailable by Police themselves.

2) Non Bailable warrant is bailable, not by police, but by the Court. Therefore, this is known as Non Bailable warrant..Here only the court can grant bail if it thinks fit.

Thus basically both are bailable...

Now when and why these warrants are issued by Courts....

When courts wants someone to appear before it, it asks him by three modes :-

A) Issues order asking him to come and appear before him on particular date.

B) If he does not come on that date, through himself or through any lawyer, then the court issues bailable warrant issued through police. .....It is in fact an order stating that "Arrest this man and bring him on particular date.. .....But if he gives undertaking and to appear on date, then do not Harass him, just take bond from him and let him come on that date on his own."

Here, when police catches the man, he let's him go if he gives bond to appear before court. Therefore this is called Bailable Warrant.


C) Now, if on that date, if again, that man does not come in court, then court issues "Non Bailable Warrant".... It orders police something like this,"Arrest this man, this time do not let him go by taking bond from him. Just lodge him in jail or bring him before me.. I will see if I want to give him bail or not"

*****
This is by and large, the general idea. Next time when you read in newspapers about Bailable Warrant or Non Bailable warrant, you may get the general idea.

Haresh Raichura
4/1/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Law : Within how much time a fraudulent entry in land revenue records can be corrected -brief note

There are two basic law points which every one can understand and remember.

1) To undo a fraud, there is no time limit. A fraud can be undone by law any time whenever it is brought to attention of law.

2) For other things, if time limit is prescribed for any action, then action can be taken under that given time.

- And if No Time Limit is prescribed in rules, than the corrective action should be taken by Govt within REASONABLE TIME.

What is Reasonable time, will be decided by court by looking up facts of each case.


Haresh Raichura
4/1/2015


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Two Lama discuss on "What Chief Justice of India should aim to do in 2015 #Judiciary #India

Two Lama discuss on "What Chief Justice of India should aim to do in 2015

In The Mountains of Himalaya

In Christmas Holidays,
Younger Lama was reading books
Of Tarthang Tulku

Suddenly he looked up from book
And asked a hypothetical question to Elder Lama,

"What would Tarthang Tulku advise
To Chief Justice of India
If he happened to meet him?"

Elder Lama thought for awhile
And then replied,

"If Tarthang Tulku visited India,
And if he visited CJI,
He might give him three advices,

1) Meet your financial commitments on time,

2) Run a First Class Judiciary,

3) Bring Dharma into Justice."

Younger Lama pondered over these answers for quite some time.

Then he asked Elder Lama,
"Please elaborate. I am unable to understand what you wish to convey."

Elder Lama explained the first advice,

"It is duty of CJI to meet financial commitments of Judiciary.

It is his duty to see that all judges and all lawyers are paid their wages.

It is his duty to see that all financial requirements of Judiciary are met in time.

A judiciary which is unable to pay 

Good wages to Judges and Lawyers

Is like a Lion with legs of a goat."

Elder Lama then explained the second advice,

"Judiciary should be run with practice and procedure which are of the World Class.

At any given point of time,
Practice and Procedures of Indian

Judiciary should be First Class in the world."

Elder Lama then explained the third advice,

"Justice should be administered with Dharma in mind.
It is not enough to do justice
In accordance with Law"

Elder Lama thus explained the three advices 

••••

Younger Lama tried understand
Explanations given by Elder Lama 

In vain as the concept were too big

For his small mind to comprehend.

He then gave up efforts to understand
And resumed reading his books.

- Haresh Raichura
2/1/2015

(Theme is inspired by Arnaud Maitland's book MasterWorks: Managing Time: Skillful Means, based on work of Rinpoche Lama Tarthang Tulku)

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

One Major Reason for Delay in Murder Trials in India - Delay in Receiving Report from Forensic Laboratory #Judiciary

In cases involving murders and other serious crimes, police is supposed to complete investigation and to file Chargesheet against Accused in Six Months.

As a part of investigations, blood stains on clothes, weapons, cause of death etc have to be examined and its report have to be filed in Court.

If the report is not received in time, police files charge sheet in time without report of laboratory ! Then the Court has to await for report !
And we blame Court for Delay!

Laboratory takes time to submit reports.. Sometimes as long as 3 Years....

Imagine agony of accused, court and all other connected with trial.

I do not know what can be reasons of such delay. May be too many cases and too little staff and equipments! Or could be other reasons, I have no idea.

But this could be one major factor for delay in trials.

Haresh Raichura
2/1/15


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

How do we form "Righteousness" and how does it pain us when others don't behave as per "Righteous":- Very very brief answer

How do we form "Righteousness" and how does it pain us when others don't behave as per "Righteous":- Very very brief answer

Way back in childhood, our parents, our religious textbooks, our elders, our teachers tell us what is "Right" and what is "Wrong"

Some times that teach us that "A - Way of Life is Right" and "B to Z - Ways of Life are Wrong".

We accept some of or many of their suggestions. This forms a "Righteousness" and a "Wrongfulness" in us.

We start living in Rightful way. We also expect others to live in a Rightful way.

Here the troubles begin.

1) We feel pain when we are unable to live as per "A- Way of Life".

2) We feel pain and Anger when we see others living in "B to Z - Way of Life.

Haresh Raichura
2/1/15

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Repeal of Urban Ceiling Act - Land does not go to State if Actual Physical Possession Not taken before 1999 Sec. 10(3), 3(b)

In 1999, Urban Land Ceiling Act was Repealed.

But before that many Excess Ceiling Lands were order to be vested in Government.

Though such orders of vesting of Land in Government were passed, before government could take actual physical possession of land, the Urban Land Ceiling Act was repealed by Parliament.

Under Sec. 3(b) of Repeal Act, some clarifications were made.

As per this provision, if actual physical possession not taken by Government, than after Repeal Act came into force in 1999, the Government cannot take such land.

Supreme Court also gave recent judgements to clarify above issue.

Haresh Raichura
1/1/2015


Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

Know why Supreme Court has asked GOI to find out ways to block websites on internet:-

It is a recent case.

Advertisement of website offering "gender-test of unborn babies" is freely available on internet.

This results into silent genocide of "Girl - Child" in India.

A PIL is filed in Supreme Court to block such websites.

Notices were issued to GOI, Microsoft, Googles etc to show cause why such websites cannot be blocked?

The summary of all of their reply was:

1) GOI said, we cannot block such sites. We are helpless. Sorry.

2) Google, Microsoft etc said, We cannot block such sites. We provide only Corridors. Sorry.

Supreme Court showed displeasure as stand of "Helplessness expressed in affidavit in Court " by GOI.

It said, "A way have to be found."

It appointed a Senior Advocate, Amicus Curie, to find out in other countries 'How Websites violating law of land are blocked' and to give report to court."

The case is pending for further hearing in Supreme Court.

Haresh Raichura
1/1/2015




Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.

One Thing That Blocks Creativity of All Lawyers in India - Lawyers ought to read this ->

Once I happen to read a 1939 issue of Bombay Law Reports. It contained sections like "Letters From Lawyers".

I read those letters. Here, letters were freely criticising wrong judgements of Supreme Court and High Courts.

There were also sections like "Jokes of Lawyers", "Poems from Lawyers" etc.

All this is missing in today's all Law Reports.

All Law reports of today's are Dry Law Reports, containing just judgements and some boring lectures.

Platforms for Expression of Creativity of Lawyers is missing in all such law reports.

"Letters From Lawyers" must be included in all Law Reports so that wrong judgements of courts can be easily criticised by lawyers simply by writing letters. This will make Judiciary and Legal System Stronger.


Haresh Raichura
1/1/2015

Copyright : Haresh Raichura 2014. All Rights reserved.