This is a new idea. Idea stems from a Supreme Court Judgement which says that Arbitration Law can be applied to civil disputes of all kinds. (Not only commercial disputes)
In commercial world, arbritration has become popular.
It there is an Agreement between parties that certain type of civil disputes will be solved under Arbitration Act, then parties cannot go to Civil Courts. Court appoints a mutually agreeable person as arbitrator, and his judgement become Decree of Court.
This can solve civil disputes between husband and wife regarding divorce, maintenance, right of custody of children and their inheritance rights etc. All they need to do is to have signed an agreement that if such dispute arises in their marriage life, it will be resolved through arbitration under Arbitration laws.
An arbitrator can then be appointed by court. He can give judgement in four months.
Once, one of the party will go to arbitration, the heat of criminal cases will go away. And most probably, arbitrator will try to resolve those cases also.
This is an idea. Need to be more explored by lawyers and parties and by about to be married young generation, under guidance from their lawyers.
Haresh Raichura
29/5/13 17:32
May 29, 2013
Think Like A Lawyer (Part 3) Vague and Specific Arguments
"There were several persons who show the incident."
This is a vague argument. "Several" can mean more than 1 but can it be more. We cannot judge how many persons were there.
This is a vague arguments.
The specific arguments are considered stronger arguments.
Haresh Raichura
28/3/13 00:19
Think Like A Lawyer (Part 2) Two things happened one after other
Two things may happen one after another. But that by itself cannot prove that first thing cause second think.
Example: A left a meeting suddenly for some work. After 5 minutes a bomb blast took place in meeting.
Here, one thing happens after another, but that does not prove that person who suddenly left meeting had planted the bomb or he had any previous knowledge of blast.
Some more evidence are needed.
Two things may happen one after another. But that by itself cannot prove that first thing cause second think.
Haresh Raichura
28/3/13 00:08
Example: A left a meeting suddenly for some work. After 5 minutes a bomb blast took place in meeting.
Here, one thing happens after another, but that does not prove that person who suddenly left meeting had planted the bomb or he had any previous knowledge of blast.
Some more evidence are needed.
Two things may happen one after another. But that by itself cannot prove that first thing cause second think.
Haresh Raichura
28/3/13 00:08
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)