Many things in judgement are there which are not reported in proper perspective by media.
I would mention here about only one thing not properly projected in media.
On Earlier date, Attorney General sought time to give some proposal to Supreme Court about alternative arrangement which can be made for residents of CAMPA COLA residents.
Supreme Court recorded his statement.
Next date, Attorney General said that after examining facts of this case, he has not
been able to come up with any concrete proposal.
So Supreme Court recorded his statement and passed order.
Doors are not closed.
If any proposal has to be made in this case, it has to come from Maharashtra Government. In Judgement, neither Maharashtra Government nor Central Government has said categorical NO.
Some burden is there on Maharashtra Govt because the buildings are there since about 1984 or so. About 29 years. Many owners may have changed. Many laws have been changed.
As per my limited understanding, what these legal obligations are on State Government is not clear from judgement.
Perhaps, there appears lack of proper legal concepts in such cases. Buildings could be illegal. But residents are not illegal. If they were legal, they must also have some kind of right to live and to be protected against pick and choose type arbitrary implementation of laws.
Others do not seem to be clear on this. I am also having no clues about legal obligations of State in such exceptional cases. The obligations can be political as well as legal, but I am not clear enough to specify them.
Haresh Raichura
30/11/13
-(C) Copyright. All the articles written on this blog are with original thinking and copyright comes in as soon as they are written and published. I have acknowledged source wherever I remembered. It is permitted to share or retweet or like or to repost this blog material or to quote from them acknowledging name of author. But recently I have noticed a CEO of a Company on LinkedIn who copied from my blog and published it in his own name. I also noticed someone in Ahmedabad doing same thing and publishing material from my blog on Facebook under his name. This is one thing no author would like to approve. On internet everything these people do has digital footprints which cannot be erased. Plagmarism or credit pouching is not a good thing to do. Cyber laws are new but they are in force.
Supreme Court has not totally closed doors. Even today if Maharashtra Government or Central Government will go to Supreme Court with some concrete proposal, Supreme Court may not refuse to listen to them.
Haresh Raichura
30/11/13
-(C) Copyright. All the articles written on this blog are with original thinking and copyright comes in as soon as they are written and published. I have acknowledged source wherever I remembered. It is permitted to share or retweet or like or to repost this blog material or to quote from them acknowledging name of author. But recently I have noticed a CEO of a Company on LinkedIn who copied from my blog and published it in his own name. I also noticed someone in Ahmedabad doing same thing and publishing material from my blog on Facebook under his name. This is one thing no author would like to approve. On internet everything these people do has digital footprints which cannot be erased. Plagmarism or credit pouching is not a good thing to do. Cyber laws are new but they are in force.
